top of page

Rate My Truth: Can Generative AI Suss Out Alternative Facts?

Dahlia Arnold

Apr 1, 2024

In a world increasingly inundated with information, where distinguishing fact from fiction has become a herculean task. This AI tool aims to address this challenge. By analyzing content for factual accuracy, consistency, and bias, RateMyTruth presents an objective assessment of news articles and claims.

While RateMyTruth itself is not a person, its creators and the news consumers who use it form an integral part of the narrative. These individuals, driven by a commitment to truth and transparency, believe in the potential of AI to supplement human judgment.

Try it Here: RateMyTruth

The backdrop of this story is a digital landscape where news spreads rapidly across social media and online platforms. In this environment, misinformation can have far-reaching consequences, making the need for tools like RateMyTruth more urgent.

The case study of the WebsCrypto article on Bitcoin in developing countries serves as a practical example of RateMyTruth's application. The AI's analysis considers multiple factors such as source credibility, corroborating evidence, expert opinions, and historical context.

RateMyTruth's core functionality hinges on its advanced AI algorithms, capable of dissecting and analyzing news articles and statements. The AI evaluates multiple dimensions of any given piece of information:

  • Source Evaluation: It begins by assessing the credibility and track record of the source, scrutinizing their history for any biases or inaccuracies in reporting.

  • Corroboration Check: The AI then searches for corroborating evidence from other reliable sources to validate the claims made in the article.

  • Expert Opinion Analysis: RateMyTruth also weighs in expert opinions mentioned within the content, considering their relevance and authority in the subject matter.

  • Contradictory Evidence Assessment: It actively searches for and evaluates any contradictory evidence or viewpoints that challenge the claims made, ensuring a balanced understanding.

  • Sentiment and Bias Detection: The tool employs sophisticated sentiment analysis algorithms to detect any potential bias in the tone and presentation of the information.

  • Historical Context Integration: Understanding the historical context is crucial, and the AI incorporates this aspect to provide a comprehensive analysis.

Practical Application Example: The analysis of the WebsCrypto article on Bitcoin's rising optimism in the developing world exemplifies RateMyTruth's methodology. The AI's evaluation of this article encompassed all the aforementioned dimensions, leading to a nuanced understanding of the article's truthfulness and objectivity.



The article titled "Bitcoin Optimism Rising in Developing World Despite Price Declines" from WebsCrypto covers a range of points about the growing enthusiasm for Bitcoin in developing countries, despite its price volatility. Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:

Source Evaluation: WebsCrypto, described as a team of professional cryptocurrency journalists and authors, is dedicated to providing the latest news and insights on digital currencies. They are committed to delivering timely updates and in-depth analyses of the digital currency market, suggesting a focused and informed approach to cryptocurrency reporting​​.

Corroboration Check: The core content of the article is corroborated by Block, Inc.'s own report. Block, Inc. (formerly Square, Inc.) did conduct a global bitcoin survey in early 2023, partnering with Wakefield Research. This survey involved 6,600 people across 15 countries, aligning with the article's claims. It aimed to examine the dynamics driving bitcoin developments, especially in the context of the past year's events affecting perceptions and use of bitcoin​​​​​​. Another independent source, Cointime, also confirms the findings of the Block survey, emphasizing the growing optimism towards Bitcoin in developing countries despite market fluctuations​​.

Expert Opinion: Experts like Brock Pierce, a blockchain technology pioneer, support the view that cryptocurrencies can aid financial inclusion in developing economies. Citing the example of El Salvador, Pierce highlights the significant uptake of Bitcoin and its role in providing financial tools to the unbanked or underbanked population. Ali El Husseini, CEO of Medici Land Governance, also echoed the potential benefits of blockchain and digital currency technologies in environments with a large unbanked population​​.

Contradictory Evidence: The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) offers a more cautious perspective. UNCTAD has called for action to curb the rise of cryptocurrencies in developing nations, citing their instability and potential risks to financial stability, domestic resource mobilization, and monetary systems. It warns of the risks cryptocurrencies pose as legal tender and the need for comprehensive financial regulation, including regulating crypto exchanges, digital wallets, and decentralized finance​​.

Sentiment and Bias Analysis: The article on WebsCrypto presents a predominantly positive view of Bitcoin's role in developing countries. While it does mention some challenges, such as price fluctuations and regulatory ambiguities, the overall tone is optimistic about the potential of Bitcoin to provide financial freedom and act as a hedge against economic instability.

Historical Context: The article and corroborating sources provide a contemporary view of Bitcoin's role in developing countries, especially in light of recent economic challenges and digital transformation trends. The historical context is more implicit, focusing on the evolving perceptions and uses of Bitcoin rather than a detailed historical analysis.

Final Evaluation: Considering the evidence and analysis, the article appears to provide a reasonably accurate portrayal of the current state of Bitcoin optimism in developing countries. It is supported by findings from a legitimate survey conducted by Block, Inc. and Wakefield Research, and aligns with expert opinions in the field. However, it also faces some contrasting views from a notable organization like UNCTAD, which highlights potential risks and calls for cautious regulation. The overall tone of the article is optimistic, and while it does acknowledge some challenges, it may not fully represent the breadth of concerns outlined by UNCTAD. Therefore, the likelihood of the truthfulness of the information presented in the article is assessed to be moderately high.

The final score, based on the criteria assessed, is 77/100. This score reflects a balanced view, taking into account the article's alignment with survey data and expert opinions, as well as the existence of contrary views and the need for more comprehensive coverage of risks and regulatory concerns.

By offering an objective analysis, these tools could play a critical role in countering misinformation and enhancing journalistic integrity.

Readers of This Article Also Viewed

bottom of page